求助版主和各位高手关于万年历的LANGE和PP
28419
-
回复 | 1#求助版主和各位高手关于万年历的LANGE和PP，是不是在这个层面上PP要优于LANGE，比如LANGEMATIC PERPETUAL和PP5159或者其上代对比。
-
回复 | 2#I believe that both Patek and Lange are almost equivalent on this level. I personally like both (PP5140 and Lange Perpetual) very much and would like to own both. PP5159 is not my cup of tea, while the former 5059 is to me more elegant.
Patek and Lange represent different desigh styles and movement construction. You will never regret to own them both. -
回复 | 3#大致明白你的意思，还有“PP5159 is not my cup of tea”是不是中文的“不对我胃口”的意思，能说一下原因吗？呵呵。Lange Perpetual主要是因为手动的缘故，一直想搞自动的。5140，37的表径稍微小了一点点啊。
[ 本帖最后由 成年甲鱼 于 2007-7-6 16:30 编辑 ] -
回复 | 4#5140 is beautiful and understated, a very very nice Patek. 37mm is good for a classic watch.
Lange Perpetual is automatic (自动的). The Sax-0-Mat movement is at least as good as PP 240.
Last week I tried the Lange perpetual Pinkgold, love it!
“不对我胃口”的意思，能说一下原因吗？ No comment, just subjective reasons. -
回复 | 5#5159相对于grisar兄的手腕来讲，有些大、厚，5059小一些，还好。
前面有文章说过的，好好学习。 -
回复 | 6#Grisar，可能是我搞错了，把LANGE的两款万年历搞混了，看机芯型号就是922.1，你说的这款Lange Perpetual 应该就是我说的那个Langematic Perpetual ,这款当然是自动的了，我喜欢的就是这个。另一款的确是手动的。
-
回复 | 7#另一款的确是手动的: you mean Datograph Perpetual Calendar? Yes it is 手动的.
-
回复 | 8#嗯，世界时，而且超级贵。性价比就不高了。
-
回复 | 9#====用户禁止发言====
-
回复 | 10#没想到这里也有托啊